Skip to main content

Modern Journalism, same as always.

Penny Press, Yellow Journalism, and Muckrakers.

The news that we receive today and the news Americans received in the 19th Century are not as different as one would think. Sure, we know have social media, youtube videos, and TV to receive up-to-date news but the overall forms of news haven't changed.
Three journalism forms that took a stand in early America were the Penny Press, Yellow Journalism, and Muckrakers.

Penny Press
The Penny Press were newspapers that became available to the middle and working class beginning in the 1830's. They were from 1 cent , so it was quite affordable for people of the two lower classes. People were eager to receive what they thought was raw news, but instead were filled with sensationalized columns that had more fib than truth. Journalists and owners of these newspapers focused on the idea of pleasing its audience and essentially giving them "what they wanted", does this sound familiar yet? Although this form of newspapers was giving out news it was not the type of news that Americans should have taken very seriously.

 Yellow Journalism 
A similar form of journalism was Yellow Journalism. This type of journalism used HUGE headlines and sensationalized each column to draw more people to buy their newspapers. Yellow Journalism did use facts and research-based information, in fact most of their work had slim to little correlation with what the actual story was. The origins come from Joseph Pulitzer and Randolph Hearst's who both wanted to take over with the best press. They both were also known to show which political party they endorsed and why on the newspaper. Although not all of the news was fake most of it was unethical and full of inaccurate information.
Muckrakers
Muckrakers were journalist who's job was to expose corrupt leaders and established institutions. They were set on reforms and letting Americans know what was really going on behind closed doors. This style of journalism focused on cold-hard facts and research. Even though these journalists were ethical and truthful, people viewed them as scandalize, because as we see in today's age when someone writes about something that can be controversial it is considered "scandalize."


In Today's Age/ Differences

When I think of yellow journalism what comes to mind is tabloid-style magazines and articles. You often find these magazines by the cashier in grocery and retail stores. They promote propaganda for political figures and scandals of celebrites that aren't true. An example would be U.S Weekly, Globe, or Weekly World News. All of these magazines have big flashy headlines and pictures that make many people intrigued. A major difference between yellow journalism then and now, is that these political leaders and celebrities use social media to defame any fake news or scandals.

Muckraking is now known as investagative journalism or watchdog journalism. For me a muckraker is a whistleblower, like Julian Assange. They are out to expose everything that is corrupt in the system to open everyone's eyes. In return though, many people call it scandalize and even hate the thought of whistleblowers. A prime example of this is Julian Assange and the Wiki Leaks page, because Assange leaked a video of troops on their worst behavior, it caused many Americans to hate Julian Assange and now he's behind bars.

 Yellow Journalism and Muckraking only have one thing in common and that's causing scandals. The difference is that one survives off of fake news and the other has factual sources to pack them up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_press
https://www.thoughtco.com/penny-press-definition-1773293
https://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/yellow-journalism

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The First Amendment

You should be glad we have it On December 15, 1791 the United states adopted the first of the ten amendments that would be known as the Bill of Rights. The first amendment states, “ “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the  right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” . This amendment exists to this day and protects the American people from having certain freedoms taken away from them.  In the United States, we encourage our people to speak of anything they wish even if it is negative towards their government. It is written so that the government cannot interfere with our beliefs and the way we choose to express ourselves. Although we have this freedom, the first amendment does not protect those from putting ourselves or others in harm's way with our speech.This exception is not to i...
Post a Comment
Read more

#RunwithMaud

AHMAUD ARBERY- Remember his name Background Ahmaud Arbery was going for a jog, like he tended to do normally. He thought it would be a regular day like always, but this jog turned out to be his last. On February 23, 2020, Arbery was chased down and shot by two white men, one of whom was a retired police officer and DA investigator. Gregory and Travis McMichael, father and son killed this innocent jogger because of his skin color. These men have been known to be racist but yet when the investigation was made, they weren't arrested or charged for the killing of Arbery. Instead they walked free for two months, after leaving an innocent man on the street, dead. Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vElX_sLt2NM  (Warning graphic) In a video that was leaked, it shows Arbery jogging and trying to get away from a truck, that had the McMichael's inside. The truck continued to follow the jogger and cornered him and when the jogger tried to run the other way he was shot. Stil...
Post a Comment
Read more

Civil War

Civil War and The Press Lincoln is known as one of the greatest U.S Presidents (Williams, 2004) but there is one thing that can make many people question that statement.  Throughout the Civil War, there was controversy on what the press was able to write about, they were limited. There was a period where parts of the constitution were restricted, this included  freedom of speech and freedom of the press. "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." (First Amendment) Lincoln's reasoning for limiting what journalists  wrote about was in a sense a great thing because it freed slaves and he was able to carry out his agenda. On the other hand, this was indeed very unconstitutional because he limited the first amendment for his own advantage. He stood up to anyone that had a different view from what his personal agenda was. Un...
Post a Comment
Read more